UIDAI Indirectly Seeding Bank Accounts With Aadhaar: Opponents

Latest News

करते हैं नाइट शिफ्ट में काम? जरूर अपनाएं ये 12 हेल्थ टिप्स

View All >>

7th pay commission

7th Pay DA : जाने कितना बढ़ा महंगाई भत्ता

Good News For Central Govt Employees, Salary to Increase Up to THIS Amount
केंद्रीय कर्मचारियों का बंपर फायदा- ₹56,000 की बेसिक सैलरी पर DA बढ़कर होगा 2,08,320 रुपए, जानें कैलकुलेशन
दोगुनी होगी पेंशन! हटने वाली है 15000 रु की लिमिट? जानिए अब कितने मिलेंगे रुपये
महंगाई भत्ते के बाद अब बढ़ सकता है फिटमेंट फैक्टर, जानिए फिर कितनी हो जाएगी केंद्रीय कर्मचारियों की सैलरी!
केंद्रीय कर्मचारियों का फिटमेंट फैक्टर बढ़ेगा? 2.57 से बढ़कर 3 हुआ तो कितनी बढ़ेगी सैलरी
मप्र लिपिक वर्ग की वेतनविसंगति कब दूर होगी: कर्मचारी संघ
मनचाहा तबादला कर्मचारी का अधिकार नहीं: सुप्रीम कोर्ट –

view all>>

Allowances

Clarification regarding payment of Transport Allowance

view all>>

Central Govt

करते हैं नाइट शिफ्ट में काम? जरूर अपनाएं ये 12 हेल्थ टिप्स

view all>>

UIDAI Indirectly Seeding Bank Accounts With Aadhaar: Opponents

May 10, 2018, 8:16 AM

Bank accounts were being seeded with Aadhaar indirectly, those opposed to the scheme contended in the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, lead counsel for a host of activists opposing the mandatory nature of the scheme, accused the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) of ‘resorting to inorganic seeding’.

“Suppose you link your Aadhaar with your pension, it gets automatically linked to your bank account,” Divan told a five-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra. He cited instances where people who had never consented to seeding of bank accounts with Aadhaar receiving messages from their banks that their accounts have been linked.

Divan said the court had the option of ruling in favour of the people by making Aadhaar optional and not compulsory. He said the court cannot allow a compulsory scheme masquerading as a voluntary scheme.

“That would be against the national motto, Satyameva Jayate,” he said. He urged the court to make sure children, HIV affected, bonded labourers, trafficked women and vulnerable sections are not denied their basic right to food and health care. The court cannot allow the government to treat those seeking social service benefits as secondclass citizens, he argued.

“Some of these are not even benefits, but entitlements. Can they be taken away,” he asked. He urged the court not to roll back certain rights it had listed as part of the Fundamental Right to Life of a citizen such as education, mid-day meals given under right to food etc. You cannot take away existing rights, he said.

Source: ET

Disclaimer: The Information /News /Video provided in this Platform has been collected from different sources. We Believe that “Knowledge Is Power” and our aim is to create general awareness among people and make them powerful through easily accessible Information. NOTE: We do not take any responsibility of authenticity of Information/News/Videos.

This entry was posted in Employee Misc, Central Govt